Using their own cells, they would be given the chance to truly heal with less complications. Under the current state of this research, millions of eggs would need to be studied and researched, but there is just no sufficient supply right now to create such amount of embryos. Precisely because the stakes are so high, precisely because the new biotechnologies touch not only our bodies and minds but also the very idea of our humanity, we should ask ourselves how we as a society want to approach questions of human dignity and flourishing.
Rather, we are suggesting that they would, like other human "products," be brought into being in accordance with some pre-selected genetic pattern or design, and therefore in some sense "made to order" by their producers or progenitors. It is also a technology, a human experiment, and an exercise of freedom, among other things.
The required oocytes would have to be donated, and the process of making them available would involve hormonal treatments to induce superovulation.
You can leave skin cells even on a computer keyboard, and those cells could be used to clone you if cloning becomes a reality.
They are neither enabling nor restoring a natural process, and the alterations involved are such that success in one species cannot be presumed to predict success in another.
The effort may be guided by apparently good intentions: Cloned children may experience concerns about their distinctive identity not only because each will be genetically essentially identical to another human being, but also because they may resemble in appearance younger versions of the person who is their "father" or "mother.
Yet the fact of success in that case does not establish precedent in this one, nor does it mean that the first attempts at IVF were not in fact unethical experiments upon the unborn, despite the fortunate results.
The fact that those engaged in cloning cannot ask an unconceived child for permission places a burden on the cloners, not on the child. This will make the price even higher. Parents that have lost a child can have that child returned to them with a clone.
The cloned child may be constantly compared to "the original," and may consciously or unconsciously hold himself or herself up to the genetic twin that came before. In Chapter One we outlined some morally significant features of human procreation and raised questions about how these would be altered by human cloning.
Keep in mind that this technology will not be used on humans until it can be used in a safe and reliable manner. It is true that we are currently lacking the knowledge and technology to clone human beings successfully at a reasonable cost. It can also bring about the recreation of species that have long since died, allowing scientists to fully study the species as a living creature instead of simply looking at images or bones.
But there are also many risk factors. But, others believe that it is a very successful way to obtain the organs needed for an operation.
Clones could be seen as less than human compared with non-clones.
We must consider what kind of a society we wish to be, and, in particular, what forms of bringing children into the world we want to encourage and what sorts of relations between the generations we want to preserve. With the hundreds of failed embryos, this goes along with the murder concept. First, many people who are repelled by or opposed to the prospect of cloning human beings are concerned not simply or primarily because the procedure is unsafe.
Those who favor eugenics and genetic enhancement were once far more open regarding their intentions to enable future generations to enjoy more advantageous genotypes.
Even were cloning children to be rare, the moral harms to a society that accepted it could be serious. Another issue with cloning that I would like to go into further detail about is cloning for agricultural purposes.
How is it that other infertility treatments are not considered "playing God" but cloning is. This might constrain the clone's sense of self in ways that differ in kind from the experience of identical twins.
Clones won"t be "exactly" the same as their donor, the environmental factors change their personalities and actions. We do not assume that cloned children, once produced, would not be accepted, loved, or nurtured by their parents and relatives. Scientists have discovered technology that allows them to inject cloned healthy heart cells into damaged hearts to repair cells and prevent premature deaths by heart attacks.
Why would babies who are clones be treated differently than any other child conceived with biotechnology assistance test tube babies. It takes away the need for other potentially controversial medical procedures, such as xenotransplantation.
Therapeutic cloning could allow an individual's own cells to be used to treat or cure that person's disease, without risk of introducing foreign cells that may be rejected. Thus, cloning is vital to realizing the potential of stem cell research and moving it from the lab into the doctor's office.
Therapeutic Cloning; Is It Worth the Risks? About the Authors; Cons of Reproductive Cloning. Are you willing to risk it all?
Reproductive cloning is used to copy an entire organism. Dolly the sheep was created through this type of cloning. However, reproductive cloning of humans should not be allowed. Multiple studies and statistics agree. May 26, · The Pros and Cons of Cloning: Is it Worth the Risk?
May 26, by Natasha Quinonez.
Find out the pros and cons, and decide for yourself if cloning is worth the risks. Take an introduction to biology with an online class. Pro: Reproductive Cloning.
Reproductive cloning has a number of pros. Much of it relates to helping human families gain Author: Natasha Quinonez.
Is Therapeutic Cloning Worth the Risk? Is Therapeutic Cloning Worth the Risk? I. The history of cloning A few years ago, a movie showed how Adolf Hitler could have been cloned to produce copies of himself. Of course, this is a terrible idea, because as we know, Hitler killed millions of people.
Yet, people now have cloning that can benefit. Cloning can be useful in two different ways, one way is referred to as therapeutic cloning. Therapeutic cloning is a process by which embryonic stem cells are produced to repair or replace damaged cells or organs in the body.
 Therapeutic cloning is the use of cloning techniques to develop therapies, rather than produce a baby. Its primary goal is to provide a source of embryonic stem (ES) cells, those rare but remarkable cells that could potentially be directed to develop into almost any kind of cell in the body.Is therapeutic cloning worth the risk